How America was Born Assignment Help
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
How America was Born Assignment Help
1)In 1491, Charles Mann argues that the environment in the Amazon was created and managed by Native populations, not “pristine” wilderness.
In the years that followed European contact, he cites historical evidence that indicates that it wasn’t a lack of intelligence or “fitness for survival” that so many died, but rather that without immunity to new diseases, Native Americans died end masse. With a smaller population, their civilizations were made weaker and vulnerable to attack.
How does – or does it not – change your view of Columbus Day and the national narrative about “How America was Born”? Cite at least one passage from Mann, Handsome Lake or Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz.
Mann, Charles. “1491.” The Atlantic, March 2002. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2002/03/1491/302445/
The Inka had such grandiose monuments like Machu Picchu. The Mayan had Calakmul. The Aztec had incredible statues and gold. The dominant narrative in history tends to see these sorts of things as representative of civilization, if not progress. We are clearly leaving “human rights” out of the picture, for the moment.
But what if the actual forest is an anthropogenic space? (“Anthropogenic” means “impacted or shaped by humans.” European colonizers did not necessarily recognize it as such, but it was a space of humans living as “a part of” rather than “apart from” the land.
Additionally, what is the potential promise but also pitfall that could be associated with saying: “humans have always been developing the land”? (Hint: see Mann’s discussion of Deneen and Cronon and the Wilderness Act of 1964 and Aldo Leopold’s Great Roads Movement critique). Cite at least one passage from both Mann and Leopold.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2002/03/1491/302445/
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow