Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Part 1 (50%)
Earth’s General Store (EGS) is at a crossroads and must make a decision that will determine the future direction of the company. There are multiple options. The case provides two years of Income Statements. You are to advise the company which direction you feel it should pursue.
Perform a financial analysis with the limited financial information that you have available. Use the analytical tools that you feel are most relevant. Identify the events or reasons that you feel led to the changes from 2014 to the 2015 Income Statements. (30%)
Identify what you feel are the different options that are available. Be specific! Identify the pros and cons of each option. Your analysis should include both quantitative and qualitative factors for each option. (10%)
Based on your analysis, select what you feel is the best option to recommend to EGS. List the reasons supporting your recommendation. Use point form (bullet points) throughout your analysis. (10%)Part 2 (50%)
The Balanced Scorecard has been called a strategic performance measurement system. Considering the option you recommended in Part 1 and the factors that are key for EGS’s future success, prepare a Balanced Scorecard and a Strategy Map for the company. The Balanced Scorecard must identify objectives and measures that relate to critical success factors from the case information. You should identify at least two objectives for each Balanced Scorecard perspective. You should also provide one performance measure for each objective. The Strategy Map must show specific cause-and-effect relationships among the objectives.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow