Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Project 1 (Quantitative) Choose a peer-reviewed research article in occupational therapy that was published within the last two years. For project 1, this article must be a quantitative research study (No case studies, no grounded theory research, no meta-analyses, etc.). Analyze the article using the CRAAP test and support that is a useful/valid/credible resource. Identify the hypothesis of the research study. Identify the population of interest and the sampling strategy used to obtain participants. How many participants were in the study and what was the demographic breakdown? Identify the variables in the study. What is being examined or measured? For the variables, provide an operational definition, identify the instruments or strategies used to collect data on each of the variables, and identify the scale of measurement for the data related to each variable under examination. For each of the instruments, discuss the data related to the validity and reliability of each. Discuss possible problems with the validity and/or reliability of the entire study. Why should you interpret the outcomes with caution? Identify any ethical considerations possibly associated with the research study. What might an IRB have considered an area of concern? Generate your own Informed Consent document that could be given to participants based upon
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow