Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? Cornia, P., Hersh, A., Lipsky, B., Newman, T., Gonzales, R.. (2010). Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(8), 890. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1181 Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis van de Beek, D., de Gans, J., Spanjaard, L., Weisfelt, M., Reitsma, J., & Vermeulen, M. (2004). Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis.
Assign 2, 2012(350) Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? Cornia, P., Hersh, A., Lipsky, B., Newman, T., Gonzales, R.. (2010). Does This Coughing Adolescent or Adult Patient Have Pertussis? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(8), 890. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1181 Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis van de Beek, D., de Gans, J., Spanjaard, L., Weisfelt, M., Reitsma, J., & Vermeulen, M. (2004). Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(18), 1849. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040845 Read these two abstracts from the posted articles and comment on the quality of the abstract. Would you recommend publishing this article? Now act is if you were the peer reviewer for this article and rate* the author on: Quality of writing and Support for the conclusion which has been reached. Comment on scores below a ranking of 4 and make a suggestion for improvement. What where the strengths of the paper? Any additional thoughts you have on how the article could have been presented better should be included. Comment on the title. Was it appropriate or misleading?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|