Hair Love Film Analysis Assignment Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Hair Love Film Analysis Assignment Paper
FINAL DRAFT INSTRUCTIONS:
The Final Draft is worth 10% of your overall course grade.
For the Final Draft, students will write a 1,000- word minimum, critical analysis of the selected short film. This is a Gordon Rule Paper and must be completed with a passing grade in order to pass this course.
By now, you have already submitted your First Draft and received the instructor’s feedback. You’ll apply this feedback to revise your first draft and add the final written sections to complete your final draft.
As with all written assignments, your Film Review must follow MLA formatting and citation guidelines.
See the associated Film Review Grading Rubric for grading criteria. Students will receive feedback using the grading rubric and any additional general comments with the assessment.
FINAL DRAFT REQUIREMENTS:
Apply the instructor’s feedback along with additional edits and improvements to the Film Review First Draft you submitted in the previous module. Remember that your first draft included:
Introduction – 1 Paragraph
Plot Summary – 1 – 2 Paragraphs
Once you are satisfied with the revised first draft, you are ready to complete your Final Draft by writing the final required criteria:
Critical Analysis – 2 – 3 Paragraphs
Most importantly, the purpose of this assignment is to assess your understanding of some of the formal elements of film. I strongly suggest you read and reference the lessons that introduce the formal elements of film as you conduct your analysis and write this portion of your essay.
Strong evaluations will competently analyze at least three formal elements in the body of the paper. For example, you’ll analyze the film in terms of at least – but not limited to – three of the following:
mise-en-scene
editing cuts – jump cuts, cross-cutting, cutting on action, invisible cuts, smash cuts, etc.
editing transitions – j-cuts, l-cuts, wipes, fades, dissolves, etc.
montage
camera shots, angles, and movement – long shots, wide shots, establishing shots, close-ups, zoom, pan and/or tilt
lighting
depth of focus
sound editing – voiceover narration, musical score, etc.
special effects and stunts
Evaluation and Conclusion – 2 or 3 Paragraphs
This is where your paper becomes more personal to you and your personal preferences. You can grab the attention of your readers by telling people about YOUR overall experience. Give your honest opinion and explain why you liked/didn’t like the film short. Did it meet your expectations? Tell your readers if the film is worth seeing or not. What made this film short stand out from others you’ve seen?
As you conclude and give your paper a sense of finality, be sure to include some critical thinking conclusion here – what social, political, or cultural values are reflected in this film? What is the moral or message of the film? Is the film relatable? What is the primary takeaway that audiences should contemplate/feel as a result of seeing this film? How was it enriching? Or not?
It is recommended that you think about the film in terms of its context (social/political/cultural climate) and its legacy. Will it endure the test of time and resonate with future generations?
TO SUMMARIZE
Final Draft is worth 10% of the final grade and is a required Gordon Rule Assignment
Final Draft must be written according to college-level writing standards
Final Draft must follow MLA guidelines for formatting and citation
Final Draft should include the following criteria
Introduction – 1 paragraph
Plot Summary – 1 to 2 paragraphs
Critical Analysis including at least 3 formal elements – 2 to 3 paragraphs
Evaluation and Conclusion – 2 to 3 paragraphs
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Hair Love Film Analysis Assignment Paper
Hair Love Film Analysis Assignment Paper