Good Source Environment Science Discussion Assignment Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Good Source Environment Science Discussion Assignment Paper
It’s a workshop about my research paper during the lecture, every question will based on my research paper.
Find two scholarly articles that you think would be good sources to use in your paper. (from the references of paper outline, if you got from Library web, that would be great)
Be prepared to explain the following at some point during the workshop:
Good Source Environment Science Discussion Assignment Paper
where did you look for these sources? (e.g., which database did you use and why that one? How and where did you find that database and how do you know it is a good one for your purpose?)
how did you look for these sources? (e.g., what was your search strategy and what search string did you use?)
how do you know this is a ‘good source’? (e.g., what qualities does this article possess and how do you know that?)
Toy Story 1 Film Analysis
Good Source Environment Science Discussion Assignment Paper
I’m working on a film question and need support to help me learn.
Watch an animated movie that was released before you were born! (MOVIE: TOY STORY 1)
submit a one page (approx 250 words) paper with the following:
Paragraph 1: The movie you picked and a quick summary of the plot
Paragraph 2: your thoughts on the movie’s story
Paragraph 3: critical analysis such as:
film’s contribution to society and/or animation field
identifying important themes
historical implications of the film
unique style applications
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature
Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Good Source Environment Science Discussion Assignment Paper
Good Source Environment Science Discussion Assignment Paper