Challenge of Protection of Human Health and Safety
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Challenge of Protection of Human Health and Safety
The legal responsibility of the Incident Commander relative to the challenge of the protection of human health and safety verses the responsibility to protect the potential loss of protected natural resources.
The extent to which such potentially dichotomous responsibilities may or may not be, mutually exclusive.
The potential for legal liability on the part of the Incident Commander, relative to failure to either adequately protect human health and safety and / or adequately safeguard against the potential loss of protected natural resources.
Theories Discussion Paper
PART I
This discussion is designed to introduce you to the field of Sociology. After you have read the textbook and lectures assigned for this week, please respond to the following questions:
What are the four major sociological theories?
Which theory do you think is most relevant to your life and the lives of those in your community? Why?
Identify a social phenomenon in your community. How would the theory you chose approach the exploration of this phenomenon? Explain the pros and cons of that research method and describe how it might influence the conclusions of your imaginary study.
How would one of the other 3 sociological theories approach this same phenomenon?
PART II
Current Events Analysis
PURPOSE
The purpose of this assignment is to analyze current events through key sociological concepts (e.g., social class, family systems, gender roles, race, ethnicity, religion).
DIRECTIONS
To complete this assignment, you will: (a) find an online article related to a social problem involving social class, family systems, gender roles, race, ethnicity, and/or religion. (b) read the article and fill out the statements or answer the questions in the worksheet template here; and (c) include a link to the article or attach a copy.
Since this is a current events assignment, you are to choose an article that is no more than a week old.
You may only use articles from credible newspapers, magazines, or broadcast news media sources. Acceptable sources include the following:
http://www.nytimes.com (New York Times – newspaper)
http://www.washingtontimes.com (Washington Times – newspaper)
http://www.washingtonpost.com (Washington Post – newspaper)
http://www.latimes.com (Los Angeles Times – newspaper)
http://www.chicagotribune.com (Chicago Tribune – newspaper)
http://www.msnbc.com (NBC – broadcast T.V. news)
http://www.cnn.com (CNN – cable T.V. news)
http://www.usnews.com (U.S. News & World Report – magazine)
http://www.foxnews.com (Fox – cable T.V. news)
http://www.abcnews.go.com (ABC – broadcast T.V. news)
http://www.cbsnews.com (CBS – broadcast T.V. news)
http://online.wsj.com/home-page (Wall Street Journal-newspaper)
http://www.time.com/time/ (Time Magazine)
http://www.reuters.com/ (Reuters News Service)
http://www.ap.org/ (Associated Press News Service)
http://www.bloomberg.com/ (Bloomberg News Report)
http://www.bbc.com (BBC – broadcast T.V. news)
You may not use Social Media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter), Blogs, Entertainment, Gossip, or Sports-focused outlets. If you identify articles of interest posted in these outlets, you must go to the original sources to verify they meet the information literacy requirements detailed above.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Challenge of Protection of Human Health and Safety
Challenge of Protection of Human Health and Safety