Environmental Justice and Agriculture Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Environmental Justice and Agriculture Discussion
Students should answer the following prompt:
Reflect on your local community in the Cayman Islands. Describe your community’s options for gaining access to high quality food (including produce and meats). Include in your reflection the answers to these following questions —
[1] Where does most of your food come from? Is it grown locally or imported?
[2] If it is grown locally, do you know what type of farm it comes from?
[3] How would you rate the quality of the food, on average, in your community?
[4] How does your community compare to other areas?
[5] What are some local issues you are concerned about, with respect to accessing healthy food?
[6] Do you feel access to quality food is a fundamental human right which all people should be given — or is it a commodity that should be capitalized on? Explain your reasoning.Concept of Half Life of An Unstable Atom Discussion
I’m stuck on a Environmental Science question and need an explanation.
Define the concept of half life of an unstable atom. If you have 24 grams of an unstable atom with a half life of 5,000 years, how many grams would be left after 15,000 years? Explain how an isotope of Uranium can be used to date the age of the earth earth. About what is the age of the earth by this method?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Environmental Justice and Agriculture Discussion
Environmental Justice and Agriculture Discussion