Applying Tort Law to Compensate Healthcare Malpractice Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Applying Tort Law to Compensate Healthcare Malpractice Paper
A Case of Malpractice?
Locate one or more news articles about a particular claim of malpractice in the healthcare field. You will use your research to write a paper of between 500 and 900 words (approximately 2 to 3 pages).
Begin your paper with a brief summative review of tort law, indicating its purpose, theories, and common causes of action. Then discuss the case featured in your source(s), showing how it fits into the general category of tort law. Include the following:
Provide a short summary of the facts.
What is the cause of action (type of tort)?
What elements need to be proved?
How do the facts related in the article demonstrate or fail to demonstrate that these elements are met?
Would the article need to include more facts for you to render a verdict? Explain.
Mobile Health Technology Presentation
- Discuss privacy and security concerns that are inherent in mobile technology (mHealth) by doing the following:
- Define mHealth.
- Analyze two risks of using mHealth.
- Analyze two benefits of using mHealth.
- Discuss the legal and ethical considerations of a healthcare organization using mHealth.
- Analyze two modifications that have been made to HIPAA to address mHealth.
- Discuss one method of delivering training on ensuring the security and confidentiality of health data when using mHealth for each of the following groups:
physicians, including day and night shifts
nursing staff, including day and night shifts
ancillary staff, including day and night shifts
- Create a multimedia presentation (e.g., Microsoft PowerPoint, Apple Keynote) in which you outline an implementation plan for the training sessions discussed in part B for the executive team of a healthcare organization. Your presentation should do the following:
- Explain the importance of delivering the training, including the risks of not delivering the training.
- Identify the key members of the implementation team, and explain why they are key members.
- Summarize the stages of the implementation plan for delivering training to physicians and nursing and ancillary staff.
- Explain one barrier or resistance to attending security and confidentiality training sessions for each of the following groups:
physicians
nursing staff
ancillary staff
- Recommend one method to resolve each barrier explained in part C4.
- Provide a link to a 10–15 minute audiovisual recording of yourself that incorporates your multimedia presentation. (I can record myself but if there can be notes added on the presentation)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Applying Tort Law to Compensate Healthcare Malpractice Paper
Applying Tort Law to Compensate Healthcare Malpractice Paper