Statistical Significance Discussion Essay Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Statistical Significance Discussion Essay Assignment
According to the Community Tool Box (n.d.), when it comes to statistics, the term significance has a particular content. The level of confidence you can have in the response you obtain is determined by the statistical significance of the outcome. In general, researchers do not believe a finding is significant unless it indicates at least a 95% likelihood that it is correct which is known as the. 05 level of significance, because there’s a 5% possibility that it’s incorrect (CTB, n.d.).
Therefore, an example of how statistical significance was determined regarding my policy analysis project would be the Crifaisi et al. (2018) study between 1984 and 2015, which examined the effects of shall-issue laws and four other gun regulations on homicides in large, urban counties. The findings indicated that shall-issue laws were related to a significant rise in firearm homicide rates using a Poisson model that included year-fixed effects, random effects for counties, and county-level demographic and economic factors. The results concluded that counties should expect 1.04 times more firearm homicides (95-percent CI = 1.02, 1.06) when these regulations are implemented (Crifasi et al., 2018).
Reference
Community Tool Box. (n.d.). Collecting and Analyzing Data. (37) 5. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/e…
Crifasi, C. K., Merrill-Francis, M., McCourt, A., Vernick, J. S., Wintemute, G. J., & Webster, D. W. (2018). Association Between Firearm Laws and Homicide in Urban Counties. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 95(3), 383-390. doi:10.1007/s11524-018-0273-3
Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Statistical Significance Discussion Essay Assignment
Statistical Significance Discussion Essay Assignment