Electronic Health Records Deploying Digital Systems Reflection
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Electronic Health Records Deploying Digital Systems Reflection
Journal activities in this course are private between students and the instructor. Journal assignments will serve as a personal reflection on your knowledge and experience relating to leadership and healthcare. This journal is only graded for compliance with completing it. If you provide a thoughtful and nicely developed response you will receive all the points. (See the grading rubric) If you only provide answers with no real reflection, you will only receive partial credit. If you use in-text citations, you must provide APA formatted references. The journal does not require a title page, but your name and the title “Journal Week _” should appear on the top. Also, you do not need to provide a separate reference page; any references may be placed at the end of the journal.
Topic: Consider the pros and cons of the electronic health record (EHR). Present both sides of this debate. Also include information about the HIPAA guidelines and relate the debate to both the direct and indirect care settings. How can you as a DNP prepared nurse help support the protection and privacy of health care information of patients?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Electronic Health Records Deploying Digital Systems Reflection
Electronic Health Records Deploying Digital Systems Reflection