Ethical Considerations on Cannabis and Tobacco Using Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical Considerations on Cannabis and Tobacco Using Discussion
please respond to the following discussion post as a peer commenting on the post. The purpose of the study that I chose was to determine the effects of smoked cannabis and tobacco which involved male human subjects. The objective of this placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-subjects human laboratory study was to gather preliminary data on how smoking active versus placebo cannabis impacts tobacco cigarette smoking behavior, craving, and subjective effects. During the study, participants smoked one cannabis cigarette, and approximately 30 minutes later were given a 5-min ad libitum period to smoke one of their own brands of tobacco cigarettes (Peters et al., 2021).
Ethical considerations that were observed in this study were that the voluntary participants had to first endure a screening to qualify. The participants had to be healthy, ages 18-55, and had to be active cannabis and tobacco users. The chosen participants had to then provide informed consent to participate in the study. These individuals were then closely monitored so they would not experience excessive intoxication or other negative effects from cannabis. These measures were done to ensure participant safety during the study.
The study products were approved by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. Lastly, the procedures of the study were approved by the Battelle Institutional Review Board, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and National Institute on Drug Abuse Drug Supply Program. The study was also registered on clinicaltrials.gov.
Ethical considerations in research are similar to ethical considerations when providing health care services because they both must provide consent that the patient or participant is willing to participate in a study or to receive health care services. Also, both must ensure that patients’ and participants’ safety and well-being are a top priority.
Reference:
Peters, E. N., Herrmann, E. S., Smith, C., Wilhelm, J. A., Koszowski, B., Halquist, M., Kosmider, L., Poklis, J., Roth, S., Bart, S., & Pickworth, W. B. (2021). Impact of smoked cannabis on tobacco cigarette smoking intensity and subjective effects: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-subjects human laboratory study. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000391
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Considerations on Cannabis and Tobacco Using Discussion
Ethical Considerations on Cannabis and Tobacco Using Discussion