Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Purpose Of Change Of Custody Investigative Action
Control Number: This is typically an agency case number, or number identifying the investigative action for which the evidence was collected.
Report/Cross-Reference Number: Same as the Control Number; may contain a second related number.
Receiving Agency: This is the organization to which you belong at the time you seize the evidence.
Location: This is typically the location of the organization to which you belong at the time you seize the evidence.
Name, Grade, and Title of Person from Whom Received: This one is pretty self-explanatory. This block should contain the name and (if applicable) the grade (e.g., GS-12, SSG, Detective 1, etc.) and title (e.g., CSO) of the person from whom you receive the evidence. If they are the owner of the evidence, mark that box; if they are not, the “Other” box is more appropriate. If the item is not seized from a person, but rather from a place (like a crime scene, for example), printing “CRIME SCENE” in this block and checking “Other” is most appropriate.
Address: This is the address of the person or the address of the location from which you obtain the evidence.
Location from Where Obtained: This may seem redundant and a duplication of the “Address” block, but it is meant to be more specific. For example, one might write “Right hand of JOHNSON at 2345 Fake Street, Martinsville, OK 56789”; keep in mind that while Mr. JOHNSON’s home address was what you printed in the “Address” block, this is the address at which Mr. JOHNSON was located when you actually took the evidence from him. Or, if the evidence was collected from a crime scene, one might write “Top left-hand drawer in master bedroom dresser at 2345 Fake Street, Martinsville, OK 56789”.
Reason Obtained: Things such as “Safe Keeping” or “Evidence” would be appropriate here based on why you are seizing the item(s).
Time/Date Obtained: Self-explanatory.
Item: Starting at 1, items are numbered sequentially.
Quantity: If you have more than one of the same type of item (like CDs, for example) you can put the quantity here.
Description of Articles: This is where you describe the item(s) you took. Be ask descriptive as possible. It is better to be overly descriptive than too brief. A description usually looks something like this: “Hard disk drive, 320GB, Seagate-brand, Model ST5934570, Serial Number HT234J66097, silver-in-color, metal-type construction, used condition. Marked for ID with RDP, 26 Jan 12, RDP”
Purpose of Change of Custody: Why did you take it? Like at the top of the form, something like “Safe Keeping” or “Evaluation as Evidence” is appropriate.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results