Creating A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Creating A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Assignment
As a project manager, when should you especially consider cultural differences?
Question 1 options:
When you break down scope to create a work breakdown structure (WBS).
When you assign human resources to do the work in a schedule activity.
When you develop acceptance criteria for work results to be achieved by the team members.
When you decide upon recognition and awards during team development.
As the project manager in a currently initiated software project, you want to assess high-level risks. What should you do?
Develop the project charter and a risk management plan to start identifying risks based on those and other documents.
Develop contingency plans and fallback plans in case the original plan proves wrong.
Discuss the risks documented in your Risk Register with the project key stakeholders.
Identify and analyze risk events using qualitative and quantitative techniques
Your organization is considering to run a project which will entail an investment of $1,000,000. The product from the project is forecasted to create revenues of $250,000 in the first year after the end of the project and of $420,000 in each of the two following years. What is true for the net present value of the project over the three years cycle at a discount rate of 10%?
The net present value is positive, which makes the project attractive.
The net present value is negative, which makes the project attractive.
The net present value is negative, which makes the project unattractive.
The net present value is positive, which makes the project unattractive.
Which of the following documents is not used as input for the validate scope process?
The requirements traceability matrix, linking requirements to their origin and tracing them throughout the project lifecycle.
The RACI matrix describing accountabilities in case of product rejection.
The validated deliverables completed and checked for correctness by the perform quality control process.
The project management plan, containing the scope baseline consisting of the project scope statement and its associated WBS and WBS dictionary.
You are in the process of contacting sellers to obtain bids and proposals. You found out that it might become a time-consuming procedure to ensure that the sellers get a clear and common understanding of the procurement process and of the needs of your project. Which technique may help you save time?
Four-eyes meetings
Advertising
Bidder conferences
Qualified sellers list
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow