US Federal Law Case Study Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
US Federal Law Case Study Assignment
Question
Question 1.1. What are responsible for guiding the activities of a particular company in the market?
Strategic decisions
Tactical decisions
Worker majority decisions
Informative decisions
Question 2.2. Which of the following is NOT one of the three broad categories that discretionary benefits fall into?
Worker’s compensation laws
Paid time off
Protection programs
Services
Question 3.3. What US federal law established a national minimum wage for employees involved in commerce (rather than just those employed by companies working for the US government), as well as prohibit most employment of minors in oppressive child labor?
The Equal Pay Act of 1963
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Question 4.4. What is a systematic process for gathering, documenting, and analyzing information in order to describe jobs?
Job evaluation
Internal consistency
Job analysis
Strategic analysis
Question 5.5. These are positive employer gestures that beyond what was required by law, created in part to thwart potential union activity.
Employee benefit plans
Welfare practices
Scientific management practices
Compensable factors
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow