Ethical behavior and Organizational Behavior Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical behavior and Organizational Behavior Discussion
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin Assignment Week Two Organizational Behavior
Attachments checked for originality? Yes Assignment Instructions
During Week 2, you will complete an Article Summary of a case study or article related to ethical behavior in the workplace. This topic is covered in the Champoux (2017) textbook assigned reading for Week 2.
Ethical behavior has a profound impact on the productivity of an organization.
The required length of the article summary paper body (not counting the title and Reference pages) is 4 pages. The paper must be properly source credited with APA formatted source citations both in the paper body and in a “Reference” page attached to the end. Correct source crediting means the words of the article author or authors are paraphrased (restated in the student’s own words, not copied), with a paper body source credit immediately following any paraphrasing and each source credited is also listed in an attached Reference page. Quoting is not needed for this assignment (your professor will be assessing the meaning you made of the material and the degree to which you analyzed and synthesized it with contents from course readings, not how well you can quote words written by someone else). Only a brief sentence or two of quoting is permitted and they must be in quotation marks with a source credit immediately following. Papers not following the above rules are, by definition, plagiarized and will be assigned zero points per the course rule concerning academic integrity.
Each article summary will:
Begin with an introduction identifying the article’s primary focus and end with a conclusion paragraph describing how the research methods used might have impacted the research results and what impact the research had on ethical behavior.
Identify the article, the author(s) and the date of publication, both in the body of the paper and in an attached Reference list and the focus of the case study.
1. Describe the ethical dilemma that the organization faced.
2. Describe how the organization addressed or failed to address the ethical dilemma.
3. What consequences did the organization face as a result of its chosen course of action?
4. What were the psychological implications to the individual(s) in terms of drawing attention to the problem versus ignoring the problem?
5. What were the legal, moral, and ethical implications of the course of action taken?
6. Discuss concepts, theories, and principles included in the course textbook to show synthesis of what course of action could have been taken to rectify this situation.
7. What solution would you recommend to change the outcome of the situation?
Finally, end with a 2-paragraph conclusion that summarizes the corporate ethical dilemma, the corporate solution that management chose, and the suggested course of action that you would choose.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results