Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Linnaean Taxonomy and Phylogenetics Essay Assignment
I’m working on a biology multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Systematics is a tricky venture. Since the time of Aristotle, humans have been attempting to classify life on earth. In our modern scientific era, two primary modes of classification have been established: Linnaean Taxonomy and Phylogenetics. While both focused on classifying life, each model has different philosophies and different methods (grades versus clades).
Explain the philosophical and methodological differences between Linnaean Taxonomy and Phylogenetic classification. Be sure to include:
-The logic behind morphological grades
-The logic behind evolutionary clades
-The methods of building a phylogeny (this relates to cladistics)
-Potential problems with each classification scheme (we reviewed potential problems with each)
Linnaean Taxonomy and Phylogenetics Essay Assignment
Biology NOVAL Labs Questions
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/labs/lab/evolution/
27. Use the related feature for the two species you chose (hint: watch the video included in the deep tree to learn how to use the related feature). When did these two species diverge? What traits do they have in common?
Linnaean Taxonomy and Phylogenetics Essay Assignment
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|
Linnaean Taxonomy and Phylogenetics Essay Assignment