Ethical Experience Analysis Deontology Application Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical Experience Analysis Deontology Application Assignment
Select a work-related ethical scenario that you or someone close to you has experienced. Organizations and names should be changed when identifying references in the assignment.
Write a minimum 850-word evaluation (excluding the title and references pages).
- Identify the key positions, titles, and assigned responsibilities in the organization.
- Discuss and illustrate the individual pressures faced and how the issues were handled or delegated to another position.
- Describe how changing attitudes and behavior evolved as incidents occurred.
- Compare and contrast the behaviors in the scenario with Unit II’s referencing of the philosophical theories of ethical decision-making. Examples may include Utilitarianism or Deontology application.
- Illustrate any mishandling of the decision-making process that resulted in lessons learned.
- Summarize what you have learned from an analysis of this event.
Your assignment must:
- Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment (Article Current Event Review), the student’s name, and the university name. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Experience Analysis Deontology Application Assignment
Ethical Experience Analysis Deontology Application Assignment