Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Environmental Science Discussion Assignment Questions
Choose four (4) of the following questions to answer.
. You have to do any four of this
d1) Consider Dr. Shiva’s lecture (https://youtu.be/7M3WJQbnHKc): (i) connect four arguments of Dr. Shiva’s to any readings’ arguments from the textbook (any readings on the syllabus up to and including the Morito reading); (ii) provide two arguments of your own to support any two arguments
made by Shiva; and (iii) provide two objections of your own to any two arguments made by Shiva.2) Consider the video “The Problem with Chicken” (https://youtu.be/tIY7jxd7GAY): (i) connect four arguments found in the video to any readings’ arguments (readings on the syllabus up to and including
the Morito reading); (ii) provide two arguments of your own to support any two arguments made in the video; and (iii) provide two objections of your own to any two arguments made in the video.3) Leopold reading – (i) elaborate Leopold’s main argument/position; (ii) outline three issues not
referenced in the textbook to argue that Leopold’s argument/position suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Leopold’s argument/position on three grounds not offered by Leopold himself or by the textbook.4) Naess reading – (i) elaborate Naess’s main argument/position in this
piece; (ii) outline three issues not referenced in the textbook to argue that Naess’s argument/position suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Naess’s argument on three grounds not offered by Naess themselves or by the textbook.5) Sioui reading: i) provide three arguments of your own to support ONE of Sioui’s arguments (he presents several arguments within the piece) and (ii) provide three arguments of your own to object to one of Sioui’s arguments.6) Morito reading – (i) elaborate Morito’s main argument; (ii) outline three issues not referenced in the textbook to argue that Morito’s main argument suffers from tensions/confusions/problems; and (iii) defend Morito’s main argument on three grounds not offered by either Morito or within any of the textbook readings we have covered so far.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Environmental Science Discussion Assignment Questions |
Environmental Science Discussion Assignment Questions