Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion
In approximately 4 to 5 double-spaced typed pages, please do the following:
1)Summarize the facts of this case (about three paragraphs).
2)Summarize the law involved in the case (again, about three paragraphs): that is, state precisely and clearly what legal requirements must be proven in order to impose liability upon an employer for an accident in the workplace; also, describe any legal exceptions or defenses that are available which absolve an employer from liability. All the latter information is included in the case’s majority and dissenting opinions.
3)Summarize the majority opinion written by Judge Rogers of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in about one (1) page.
4)Summarize the dissenting opinion written by Judge Kavanaugh in about one (1) page.
5)Then, present your argument as to which opinion is more soundly written – the majority opinion or the dissenting opinion. Do this in approximately one (1) page. There is no right or wrong answer – both opinions have exceedingly valid arguments, but support your position with evidence. Which opinion is more effective and complete in applying the facts of the case to the law which governs employer liability? Point out the language in the opinions – either arguments which are particularly strong or arguments which you deem are weak or poorly supported. Finally, are there questions or arguments which you believe were inadequately covered by either the majority or the dissenting opinion? If so, what are they?
Judge Kavanaugh SeaWorld of Florida Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow