Eye Contact Facilitating Communication Discussion Responses
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Eye Contact Facilitating Communication Discussion Responses
You must respond to at least 2 classmates’ threads
First reply:
Misty Phillips
DB 3
When I consider skills that would be hardest and easiest for myself as a group leader, I appreciated the video series to help me see what they would look like. The one I would consider to be the easiest would be
drawing members out. Jacobs et. al. (2016) shared that eye contact with everyone, especially those not participating, helps to draw group members into speaking. I am the type of person that does not like to speak
up because I do not like the feeling of rejection. However, sometime ago, I learned that if the leader made eye contact with me, I felt more secure with sharing. I have found that even now, I make eye contact with
people I would like to speak up. I may not be leading groups, per se, but even in friend circles, I will make eye contact with the person not speaking. That usually encourages them to speak.
When considering the area that would be hardest for me, is cutting off. I am a timid person and the idea of stopping someone from speaking is quite intimidating for me. I felt better after reading from our textbook
because the idea of using eye contact and shifting to another person, makes it seem so much easier (Jacobs et. al., 2016). I saw Jerry Corey do this often in the video series and he was also very good at finding a
small gap and asking the new person, to whom he was making eye contact with, what they thought of the topic.
There is importance to different personality styles and they contribute to the overall good of society. In groups, power in the right manner, is very productive. Forsyth (2019) shares that positive power encourages
positive responses and actions by those under them. The idea of a group is to have a positive power that encourages goal meeting and community. Status is important because without it, someone is going to step
up and form the hierarchy (Forsyth, 2019). Establishing the status of the group, and leaders balancing that status, so that no one person runs it all, takes delicate balance. Eye Contact Facilitating Communication Discussion Responses
References
Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage
Jacobs, E. E., Schimmel, C. J., Masson, R. L., & Harvill, R. L. (2016). Group counseling: Strategies and skills. Boston,
MA: Cengage
Second reply: Eye Contact Facilitating Communication Discussion Responses
Gina Barker INSTRUCTOR MANAGER
Group Leadership Skills
It was really interesting to learn what you identified as the easiest and hardest leadership skills to acquire and use. What stood out to me in your threads was how many of these skills were identified as the easiest to
use by some and the hardest to master by others, including actively listening, using eyes, linking, modeling/self-disclosing, and drawing out members. This speaks to the critical importance of knowing your strengths
and weaknesses as a group leader. As this discussion closes this week, continue to examine these different skills while considering the role of various group dynamics—including power and status—along with leader
personality and styles. Eye Contact Facilitating Communication Discussion Responses
Eye Contact Facilitating Communication Discussion Responses
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow