Microsoft’s Contribution to Open Source Software
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Microsoft’s Contribution to Open Source Software
n recent years, Microsoft has made significant contributions to the open-source community. In 2018, Microsoft acquired GitHub, the world’s largest code-hosting platform, which is home to many open-source projects. This acquisition demonstrated Microsoft’s commitment to open source and the importance of the community. Microsoft’s Contribution to Open Source Software
Microsoft has also open-sourced many of its products and technologies, such as .NET Core, PowerShell, and Visual Studio Code, allowing developers to use these tools for free and contribute to their development. Additionally, Microsoft has contributed to open-source projects such as Kubernetes, Linux, and Apache Spark, improving the functionality and reliability of these projects.
Furthermore, Microsoft has created tools such as Azure DevOps, which is a cloud-based service for managing the entire application development lifecycle, and Microsoft Open Source Development Kit (OSDK), which is an open-source toolkit for building and deploying IoT solutions. These tools provide developers with a seamless and efficient workflow, making it easier to contribute to open-source projects.
In summary, Microsoft’s contributions to open-source software demonstrate its commitment to supporting the open-source community, providing developers with free tools and resources to build high-quality software, and advancing the state of technology.
Microsoft’s Contribution to Open Source Software
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow