Analytic Review of Inclusive Practice
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Analytic Review of Inclusive Practice
Description
You should write no more than 2000 words to review a lesson using The inclusive pedagogical approach in action (IPAA) framework to illustrate effective inclusive practice. The IPAA framework table can be found in Assignment resources on Moodle.
The IPAA framework table can also be found in the text: Deppeler, Loreman, Smith, & Florian (ed.)(2015). Inclusive Pedagogy Across the Curriculum (International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, Volume 7) available as an e-book through the Monash library (online mode only for free).
Your review should include:
? Lesson, Program or Activity Example – If you choose students can use the template provided (Assignment 2 Resources on Moodle) to describe one lesson example authored by someone else (provide references) OR a lesson planned or taught by yourself. You should describe the context, year or age group, identify the learning objectives, the specific curricular area (e.g. early years, science, literacy, health, art, music or cross curricular, adult learning etc) and name the relevant curriculum standard or link to a Curriculum framework.
Describe the key activities/lesson sequence and list any additional resources. The lesson, activity or program example should illustrate effective or not effective teaching and learning for a diverse range of learners and be connected with the IPAA framework.
If you do not have a lesson, program or activity to draw on or will use lesson plans in your practice please do not worry students can use an activity that they may have done for example in a community organisation or in the early years.
? Critical Analysis – Your critical analysis should elaborate and expand upon the ideas summarised in your lesson, activity or program. You should critically analyse and discuss how the range and development of the activities are clearly connected with the IPAA inclusive pedagogy framework. Describe the purpose and rationale behind the various teaching learning activities and show how they enact effective teaching and learning for a diverse group of learners. You should refer to the relevant literature to support your analysis.
? Presentation – APA referencing style should be used for citations in the assignment and in the reference list at the end of the paper. Your paper should be organised (use sub-headings to support presentation and understanding) and your ideas clearly written with no grammatical or spelling errors.
Analytic Review of Inclusive Practice
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analytic Review of Inclusive Practice