Full Performance Strategy Analysis Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Purpose of Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is to give learners an opportunity to apply lessons learned about performance management.
Use the same company you did in Week 2. This assignment is a spin-off of the work you did with your team. So, refer to the work you did with your team and to your text. Please refer to the resources below to assist with the assignment.
Use Attachments to complete the assignment Week two assignment is the one that says team
Assignment Steps a 1,225-word Full Performance Strategy Analysis including:
Describe the overview of the performance management process.
Include a flowchart of the performance management process.
Explain the job analysis.
Examine the skills gap analysis and performance evaluation.
Determine ways to measure employee performance.
Assess counseling for exceptional or performance that needs improvement.
Attach an appendix of the resources needed to create a comprehensive performance analysis.Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Full Performance Strategy Analysis Assignment
Full Performance Strategy Analysis Assignment