Veteran Essay Discussion Board Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Veteran Essay Discussion Board Assignment
Primary Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 200250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
For this Discussion Board, please complete the following:
You may have heard the popular saying, “you only get one chance to make a good first impression.” In both academic and professional writing, there are many aspects that can help us make a good first impression (or not) with our audiencecorrect grammar and spelling, tone, and formatting, just to name a few.
In your post, describe a situation in which you think it would be important to make a good first impression with writing.
As you describe the situation, discuss whom the intended audience is.
Discuss some steps you could take to make a good first impression with your writing in the situation you describe.
Tips for Completing Your Post
Consider situations involving work, school, or social settings. If you can think of an actual situation that you have seen, either as the writer or the audience, feel free to share that as your example.
Need an example?
Heres an example of what your primary post should look like:
As a Veteran, I try to stay informed and serve my community. I have served on local boards, volunteered my time with various charities, and participated as a county and state delegate at political conventions. As a result, I get a lot of robo-calls and my name ends up on a lot of candidate mailing lists. I once received a mailer from a candidate running for county commissioner where I live. I had no issues with the candidate, his background, or his talking points, but there were glaring grammar mistakes in his campaign literature, which made it very difficult to take him seriously. I felt like someone who went through the effort to pay for and mail out a piece of literature with all those mistakes must lack the attention to detail needed to effectively serve as a county commissioner. It is possible that it was just a mistake and that someone on his campaign staff had simply failed to proofread, but why would he hire someone who was such a poor writer to handle his campaigns communication? As much as I wanted to be objective, the damage was done. I just couldnt get past the grammar mistakes considering the qualifications he had and the office for which he was running.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Veteran Essay Discussion Board Assignment
Veteran Essay Discussion Board Assignment