Kelo Vs New London, US Supreme Court, and Connecticut Supreme Court Opinion Solution

June 23, 2021

Kelo Vs New London, US Supreme Court, and Connecticut Supreme Court Opinion

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Kelo Vs New London, US Supreme Court, and Connecticut Supreme Court Opinion

A. Please read either of these two documents in sequence for a great context and an understanding of the system. However, if you read only one, please read the US Supreme Courts Opinion and then answer the following questions. Your answers should not consume more than 5 pages in total. Typed using 1.5 spacing (50 points)
1. Based on your reading, what was the main issue in this case? Be concise but no more than 200 words (10 points)

2. Based on your reading of the case, what was the economic condition of the Fort Trumbull area? In your answer, please address the role of the New London Development

Corporation with respect to its vision, development plan and scope of work that it put forward for the redevelopment of the area (several useful sources of information may be

found on the web if you use appropriate key words in your search (20 points).

3. Please explain if the existing economic conditions in the New London area justified the ruling of the Court? (10 points)

4. What are the two pillars on which Eminent Domain stands? (5 points)
5. What, if any, are the implications of eminent domain for real estate developers? (5 points)

Kelo Vs New London, US Supreme Court, and Connecticut Supreme Court Opinion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Kelo Vs New London, US Supreme Court, and Connecticut Supreme Court Opinion

Kelo Vs New London, US Supreme Court, and Connecticut Supreme Court Opinion