Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
1st Discussion
Consider a time when you, someone you know, or someone you worked with was discriminated against because of their gender or sexual orientation. Were there any other factors present, such as religion or racial background, that made the situation even more challenging, either because of family customs and culture or other concerns? In 250-300 words, describe a scenario that demonstrates how a culturally sensitive human care provider would handle such a situation toward a positive outcome, using appropriate citations. Remember that Discrimination and prejudice can take many forms and manifest themselves in many ways, not just the prominent or reported onestwo references to back up your claims.
2nd Discussion
Watch the news piece on teen females open up about social media’s “continuous pressure” (Links to an external site.) Read Melanie Benn’s story, “A Social Worker Earns More Than Medals in the Athens Paralympics,” for more information (Links to an external site.). Consider the following questions in a 250-300 word post:
undefined
How does the emphasis on youth and beauty influence us when we grow older or become disabled?
What impact does it have on our capacity to collaborate with someone who does not share our perspective or experience with these terms?
undefined
Two references to back up your claims
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|