Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Philosophical Approaches and Decision Making in the Pinto Fires Case
Review the text’s required readings as well as the following case situations at the end of Chapters 2 and 3:
The Pinto Fires Case is here to introduce you.
Insights into the Pinto Fires Case
Script Processing and Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Pinto Fires Case
A Philosophical Approach should be the title of a 3- to 5-page paper.
Use Microsoft Word to write your paper. On the title page, include your name, the assignment name and number, the course and section number, and the date. Formatting and citations should be done according to APA requirements. Note: Your work must match the minimum requirements listed in the section of the Assignment Guidelines titled Weekly Written Assignments, as well as the grading criteria for this assignment.
When responding to each of the following questions and assertions in your paper, review and incorporate the Ethical Decision Making Steps described from Trevino and Nelson’s eight step model of ethical decision making (p. 53-59):
Which philosophical approach do you believe the recall coordinator took in recommending that the Pinto be kept in production?
Is there any evidence that Ford or its recall coordinator are morally conscious? Why do you think that is?
Put yourself in the shoes of a Ford recall coordinator. What philosophical perspective would you have chosen, and why?
Provide at least 3-4 references from the readings and other relevant sources to back up your arguments.
3 pages (explanation and answer)
Philosophical Approaches and Decision Making in the Pinto Fires Case
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Philosophical Approaches and Decision Making in the Pinto Fires Case |
Philosophical Approaches and Decision Making in the Pinto Fires Case