Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Template for Scientific Research
A scientific research is a way for scientists and researchers to communicate their findings. The author must follow a standard format and present the research in a logical and orderly manner.
Scholarly and accurate writing is required in scientific writing.
Use Times New Roman, 12 point font.
Include a title page that includes your name, institution, research title, and content page.
Make your title specific enough to describe the paper’s contents, but not so technical that only experts will understand it. The title should be suitable for the target market.
The article’s topic is usually described in the title: Smoking’s Impact on Academic Performance “A title that summarizes the results is sometimes more effective: Smoking students receive lower grades.”
Author: The name of the person who did the work and wrote the paper, as well as the title of the paper. Institution
Abstract:s A research article’s abstract, or summary, is published alongside it, giving the reader a “taste” of what’s to come. It enables other scientists to scan a large body of scientific literature quickly.
Your abstract should be one paragraph, 100-250 words long, and should summarize the paper’s purpose, methods, results, and conclusions.
In the abstract, don’t use abbreviations or citations. It should be able to stand on its own without the need for any footnotes.
Introduction/Background:
In your research, what question did you ask? What makes it intriguing? The introduction summarizes relevant literature so that the reader can see why you were interested in the question you posed. It would be sufficient to write one to four paragraphs. Finish with a sentence that explains the experiment’s specific question.
Materials and Procedures:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE SCHOOL
There should be enough information here for another scientist to conduct the same experiment as you. Examine other papers in your field to get a sense of what is included in this section.
This section should not contain any results. Preliminary results that were used to design the main experiment that you are reporting on are acceptable.
Mention any ethical concerns that come to mind. Did the people you used give their consent to participate if you used human subjects? What pain-reduction measures did you take if you used animals?
Results: This is where you present the outcomes of your research. If appropriate, use graphs and tables, but also summarize your main findings in the text. Each graph and table should have a label attached to it. Discussing the results or speculating on why something happened belongs in the Discussion section.
You don’t have to include all of the information you gathered during your research; instead, focus on the most important findings.
Use appropriate data-display methods. Don’t try to make it appear that you did more than you actually did by manipulating the data.
Graphs and tables
Include a title that describes what’s in the table or graph if you’re presenting your data in a table or graph.
You should also label the x and y axes in graphs.
Highlight the most important findings in the discussion section, but don’t just restate what you wrote in the Results section. What is the relationship between these findings and the original question? Is your hypothesis supported by the data? Are your findings in line with what other researchers have discovered?
Try to explain why your results were unexpected. Is there another way to look at your findings? What additional research would be required to address the issues raised by your findings? What role do your findings play in medical practice and healthcare?
Finish with a one-sentence summary of your conclusion, emphasizing how important it is.
Conclusion/Recommendation
The Conclusions and Recommendations sections can be combined or presented separately. Conclusions will be used if no recommendations can be made as a result of the research.
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE SCHOOL
The Conclusions section summarizes the main points of your discussion as well as the most important findings of your investigation. It should be written to directly relate to the research goals as stated in the introduction, to summarize the key findings, outcomes, or information in your report, to acknowledge limitations, and to make recommendations for future work (where applicable), and to emphasize the significance or utility of your work.
Acknowledgements
This section is completely optional. You can thank those who assisted with the experiments or contributed in other ways, such as discussing the protocol or providing feedback on the manuscript.
References
The following is a list in alphabetical order. Use the APA style. P. Celume, M. Besançon, and F. Zenasni, ‘Fostering children and adolescents’ creative thinking in education: a theoretical model of drama pedagogy training,’ Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, viewed 11 February 2019, https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02611
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Taking care of children and adolescents |
Taking care of children and adolescents