Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Biology Is Driven by Genes is a discussion topic.
It’s time to take a stand now that you’ve learnt a little bit about mosquitoes as vectors and the possibilities of gene drives. We’ll use this conversation to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of employing gene drives to combat mosquito-borne diseases.
Requirements for the Post:
Determine whether or not you agree with the following statement:
MOSQUITOES SHOULD BE USED TO CONTROL THE SPREAD OF DISEASES THROUGH GENE DRIVES.
Suggestions for expressing your viewpoint:
Make a list of the advantages and disadvantages of employing gene drives in mosquitos.
Make your argument based on your list of benefits and drawbacks. Consider how you can best support and explain each item on your list, whether by providing clear facts and details, providing an example, or presenting evidence.
This assignment needs two posts, each of which must be completed separately.
DUE THURSDAY FOR THE FIRST POST
“I agree” or “I disagree” should be the title of your post, depending on your position. Please select a large font size for your title so that your peers can easily read it.
Write six to eight sentences explaining your viewpoint. You might want to think about ethical and/or biological issues. Support your position with SoftChalk data and/or reliable (Links to an external site.) outside sources. If you use any outside sources, make sure to properly attribute them with in-text citations and a complete reference list at the conclusion.
DUE SUNDAY FOR THE SECOND POST
Respond to one of your classmates’ posts. Try to respond to someone who hasn’t gotten back to you yet. For this piece, you’ll need a reputable outside source (not SoftChalk). It has to be a different source than the ones you mentioned in your previous article.
If you agree with your classmate’s point of view, find another trustworthy outside source to back it up. Write 4-6 sentences describing how this source contributes to your argument.
If you disagree with a classmate’s viewpoint, write 4-6 sentences explaining why and provide a credible outside source to back up your claim.
For full credit, make sure to properly mention all sources, including in-text citations and a complete reference list at the conclusion.
When completing this assignment, keep in mind the standards of netiquette and be respectful in your comments. Here are some examples of courteous wording for presenting opposing viewpoints:
Yes, but on the other hand… That could be…
I see what you’re getting at, however…
You bring up an interesting issue, but…
To some extent, I agree, but… Maybe, but don’t you think…
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Biology Is Driven by Genes is a discussion topic |
Biology Is Driven by Genes is a discussion topic