Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
This assignment requires you to research an organization and develop a technology integration proposal that incorporates technology, social media, and instructional design theory. The proposal should be detailed and include all technologies and instructional design theories to be considered, as well as strategies for implementation and evaluation after implementation. Read Cydis (2015), Tracey (2012), and Zhang (2010).
Instructions: Use the following outline to help organize your paper: Abstract Background Information on the organization
Describe the organization’s products and services.
Why did you choose it?
Describe the organization’s current IT strategy.
Explain what technologies are proposed to be used within the organization and why.
Why should we integrate these technologies?
Show how technology integration supports learning theories and instructional design models.
Discuss how technology will impact education.
State the objectives that best suit technology integration.
Describe how technology will be used to support teaching and learning within the organization.
Describe any challenges with integrating technology and how to overcome them.
Explain how to measure the effectiveness of technology integration.
Provide learning theory and instructional design models to support technology implementation and evaluation strategies.
Describe how to set up an environment to effectively integrate technology to support teaching and learning.
Incorporate technology to support teaching and learning within the organization.
What is the impact of technology?
How to sustain innovative technology use?
Your assignment must also include an Abstract before the paper and a Conclusion or Summary at the end.
Use at least five scholarly and/or credible sources to support any claims, assertions, or conclusions.
Consult Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Sources (Links to an external site.). This table provides additional source type suggestions. Please contact your instructor if you have questions about a specific source.
In-text and APA references for all scholarly and/or credible sources quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
If needed, consult the Writing Center’s In-Text Citation Guide (Links to an external site) and APA Reference List (Links to an external site) websites.
Pay attention to syntax, mechanics, spelling, and grammar.
Use Grammarly to check for errors in your work before submitting it. Review the How to Set Up & Use Grammarly (Links to an external site.) tutorial if needed.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Proposal for Technology Integration