Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
USP 490 Economic assignment for urban planning
A. You should have identified your final water solution project by now. You will probably need a coalition to advocate and push your answer to this challenge.
B. Describe who the main members of your coalition network are and why (~1?2 page) (3 pts).
C. Describe how you are recruiting, communicating with and using the network coalition that you have established to push your solution (2pts).
See the other Project Theme file for the project topic you’re going to write about. Please read the directions attentively and try to get particular project details.
Abobakr Ibrahim
490 USP
Division 3
04/23/2021
Final Work Plan Project
Objective
The proposed study aims to investigate several methods in which the government can solve the problem of access to water in Oregon. Most people in the middle and south of Oregon encountered difficulty in acquiring clean water for an extended period of time. Drought in the area leading to drying of water bodies and aquifers is the major driving cause for this dilemma.
Significant literature
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/01/792692254/water-crisis-puts-oregon-community-at-a-crossroads
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-02/documents/ws-ourwater-oregon-state-fact-sheet.pdf
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/epic-drought-means-water-crisis-oregon-california-border-rcna688
Audience target
The State Government of Oregon is the primary target audience for the proposed project. It is the State government’s responsibility to ensure that every resident has access to clean and adequate water. Research findings from the initiative therefore tell the government on possible solutions to water problems in the middle and south of Oregon.
Problem statement Problem statement
Drought mountains and valleys are some of Oregon’s many locations in peril due to the draught. The State Government is the main indirect driver of the water issue in the region. The Oregon government has not implemented the right water storage measures. In 2015, Oregon faced a severe water deficit and the administration had done little to prepare for its forthcoming meetings. The problem is predicted to reoccur if the necessary precautions are not implemented.
Deliverables of the project
Written proposal for the project explaining the project purpose.
Background information for the subject
Deep analysis of the literature concerned
Recommendation of probable problem solutions
Compile and present the completed product
Plan of action and schedule
Approval by the supervisor of the research subject (week 5)
Identification and analysis of the literature needed to complete the project (week 6)
Enter the finished project (week 7-8)
Presentation of results of research (week 9)
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results