Analyzing Protocols with Wireshark Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Analyzing Protocols with Wireshark Essay
Lab #1 – Assessment Worksheet
Analyzing Protocols with Wireshark Course Name and Number: ________________________________________________________________ Student Name: ________________________________________________________________ Instructor Name: ________________________________________________________________ Lab Due Date: ________________________________________________________________
Lab Assessment Questions
- What are some causes of the number of bytes on the wire exceeding the number of bytes being captured?
- What are the source and destination MAC address in Frame 546?
- What is the manufacturer’s specific ID for Intel Core?
- What is the MAC address used for IPv4 multicast?
- What version of IP is present in Frame 546? What is the source IP address?
- At what times do the various steps of the Google three-step TCP handshake occur?
- A DNS query failure is referred to a higher level Domain Name Server under what condition?
- The descriptive text that accompanies the packet analysis is provided by Wireshark. True or False?
Course Name and Number:
Student Name:
Instructor Name:
Lab Due Date:
Text1:
Text3:
Text4:
Text5:
Text6:
Text7:
Text2:
Text8:
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyzing Protocols with Wireshark Essay