A Summary Explanatory Essay Assignment

September 14, 2022

A Summary Explanatory Essay Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

A Summary Explanatory Essay Assignment

write a Summary Explanatory essay using the three source items about Ckimate Change (1 article, 1 advertisement, and 1 Ted Talk video). This is perhaps the simplest form of Synthesis essay, but one that will give your reader a solid understanding of the relevant discussion surrounding your chosen pillar of sustainability, environmental, economic or social.

Learning Goals:

The purpose of this essay is to develop your ability to define a conversation, identify the component parts of that conversation, and present those parts to an audience in a clear and orderly fashion. You will do this in the following fashion.

Step 1

Select three relevant sources, see Synthesis Study assignment, and summarize each in order of its importance, least important to most important, identifying the concepts of sustainability found in each source and, listing each concept in order of its importance to that source.

This draft should be a minimum of 2 pages in length, typed in Times New Roman #12 font and double spaced. Page number should be in the upper right corner of each page.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met