Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Accounting Financial Accounting Capital Investments Discussion
Walden Accounting for Decision Making Discussion
Respond to two or more of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
Provide insights or contrasting observations regarding the variances presented by your colleagues.
Comment on a scenario presented and provide additional insight into the method presented and/or propose a different method for making the decision along with your rationale for choosing that method.
Accounting Financial Accounting Capital Investments Discussion
I’m working on an accounting discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Must use a company familiar to residents of the US. Please provide company selection prior to starting for approval. Some types of capital investments have associated cash flows that are very difficult to estimate, while other types of capital investments have associated cash flows that are very easy to estimate. Name two capital investments from your chosen publicly traded entity, one that has associated cash flows that are easy to estimate and one that has associated cash flows that are difficult to estimate. Explain how these two types
Accounting Financial Accounting Capital Investments Discussion
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Accounting Financial Accounting Capital Investments Discussion |
Accounting Financial Accounting Capital Investments Discussion