Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
Joint ventures and strategic alliances are common business arrangements where two or more parties come together to achieve a specific business objective. In accounting, joint ventures and strategic alliances are treated differently depending on their structure and ownership. This article will discuss how to account for joint ventures and strategic alliances in financial statements.
Joint Ventures
A joint venture is a business agreement where two or more parties agree to contribute resources to a new entity. The entity created by the joint venture is separate from the parties involved and has its own legal and financial obligations. Joint ventures can be set up as a separate legal entity, such as a corporation or partnership, or as a contractual agreement between the parties.
In accounting, a joint venture can be accounted for using one of two methods: Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
Equity Method: Under the equity method, the joint venture is treated as a separate entity, and each party’s share of ownership is recorded as an equity investment. The income or loss of the joint venture is recognized in the income statement of each party based on their proportionate share of ownership. Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
Proportional Consolidation: Under the proportional consolidation method, each party’s share of ownership is combined with the joint venture’s financial statements in proportion to their ownership. This method is no longer allowed under the current accounting standards, but may still be used in certain countries.
Strategic Alliances
A strategic alliance is a business agreement where two or more parties agree to collaborate on a specific project or business objective. Unlike joint ventures, strategic alliances do not create a separate legal entity. Instead, each party retains their own legal and financial obligations.
In accounting, strategic alliances are typically accounted for using one of two methods: Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
Equity Method: The equity method is also used for strategic alliances, where each party’s share of ownership is recorded as an equity investment. The income or loss of the strategic alliance is recognized in the income statement of each party based on their proportionate share of ownership.
Cost Method: The cost method is used when a strategic alliance does not meet the criteria for using the equity method. Under the cost method, the investment in the strategic alliance is recorded at cost and is not adjusted for changes in the value of the investment over time. Any dividends or distributions received from the strategic alliance are recognized as income.
Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances in Financial Statements
In financial statements, joint ventures and strategic alliances are reported differently based on the accounting method used. When using the equity method, each party’s share of ownership in the joint venture or strategic alliance is reported as an investment on the balance sheet. The income or loss of the joint venture or strategic alliance is reported on the income statement as a share of the equity investment.
When using the proportional consolidation method for joint ventures, the financial statements of the joint venture are combined with the financial statements of each party in proportion to their ownership. In this case, the joint venture is not reported as a separate entity on the balance sheet or income statement. Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
Conclusion
Joint ventures and strategic alliances are common business arrangements that require careful consideration in accounting. The accounting method used depends on the structure and ownership of the arrangement. The equity method is commonly used for both joint ventures and strategic alliances, while the proportional consolidation method is no longer allowed for joint ventures. It is important for companies to carefully consider the accounting treatment of joint ventures and strategic alliances to accurately report their financial position and performance.
Accounting for Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow