Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Choose a current community/group issue or problem. Suggested topics will be discussed in class within the first three weeks of the semester. Organize your PowerPoint into three sections:
Section One (15 points): Community/Group Issue or Problem. Choose an issue or problem that lends itself to an intervention plan. Using 3 to 4 references, describe and document the community/group issue/problem using secondary sources (books, journal articles, etc.) and/or primary sources (interviews, newspaper articles, demographic information using government documents). At least 2 of these references must be from peer-reviewed journals and written within the last 5 years.
As you describe the issue or problem, include its incidence and the characteristics of those most affected. Such identifying information might include:
geographic location of the community
race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation and/or other “diversity markers” of those involved
income, occupation, education
language(s)
family size and structure (if relevant)
Section Two (25 points): Intervention or “Action Plan.” The action plan section of the PowerPoint needs to consist of five subsections:
Define the objective of the plan (the change your plan aims to accomplish- 2.5 pts.);
Describe the action steps (the specific activities/strategies that will result in the change. Discuss at least three Organization Strategies (from chapter 5 of the Hogan text) that could be used in the intervention and three Personal Competencies of those persons involved in implementing the change (from chapter 4 in the Hogan text) – 10 pts);
Specify the time frame (approximately when each activity will be accomplished- 2.5 pts);
4.Describe the evaluation (the way progress toward the objective(s) will be measured5 pts.);
5.Specify the cultural awareness, understanding, and skills of the organizer that correlate with successful implementation of the plan, and again at least three of the personal competency behaviors need to be mentioned (from chapter 4 in the Hogan text- 5 pts.).
Section Three (10 points): Conclusion.
Briefly summarize the main points of the PowerPoint presentation and discuss your personal reaction to writing this action plan.
Next, describe:
what you learned about a culturally competent intervention in a diverse community and,
how you can use what you learned in a practical way when working people individuals of this community
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |