AED 301 Youth Leadership Development
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
AED 301 Youth Leadership Development
Youth Leadership Development
Assignment: Preparing an Officer Selection and Training Process
100 Points
Each student is to prepare and submit an officer selection and training program for organization officers. Students may use information from organizations they are currently members of/in, please change the name of the organization to protect the group’s privacy. The project should include the following sections: Introduction; Nomination, Selection and Election Procedures; Duties and Responsibilities of Officers; Officer Training/Development Activities scheduled on a yearly, as well as, monthly basis.
Criteria
- General Appearance/Format (10) – Does the assignment follow this rubric?
- Introduction (10) – Outlines the purpose of an election and training program for officers/executive committee members.
III. Election Procedures (25)
- Selection (how will you deem potential candidates eligible for positions of leadership)
- Nomination (will you have a nomination process for eligible candidates, if so, what will it be/look like)
- Election (which of the three election formats will you use to elect leaders)
- Officer Duties and Responsibilities (20)
- President
- Vice-President
- Secretary
- Treasurer
- Reporter
- Officer Training/Development Activities (25)
- Yearly (annual training for officers will include….)
- Monthly (monthly training for officers at the local level will include….)
- Form/Style/Grammar (10)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results