Affordable Healthcare Plan Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Affordable Healthcare Plan Assignment
Running head: AFFORDABLE CARE PLAN 1
AFFORDABLE CARE PLAN 2
Affordable Care Plan
Research Paper Assignment Instructions
Content
- Topic: Affordable Healthcare Plan
Finding Ways that everyone can have health care rights regardless of their health status / as limits on pre-existing conditions and the ways to treat them affordable.
- The research paper should include an introduction of the topic, a body in which the topic is developed, and references cited, and a well-defined conclusion.
- Your paper must have a strong thesis statement. Your thesis is a statement (not a question or a topic) that describes what your paper will be about and provides a unique perspective.
- You are required to have an abstract for your paper.
Administrative Requirements
- The paper must be a minimum of ten (10) pages in length, not including the cover page, abstract, table of contents (optional) and reference pages. Charts, graphs, photos, drawings, lists and extended quotes* will not count against the pages of written text required. *Note: It is a rare instance that an extended quote is appropriate and most of the time they are considered non-academic.
- References must follow the American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines for reference and bibliographic citation. If necessary, refer to Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ED). 2009 Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
- You must use at least five (5) academic bibliographic sources (in addition to any of the required course readings you may use). The University does not support the use of Wikipedia.com as a source for academic research papers.
- Use Times New Roman Font in a 12-point font.
- Use 1 inch for the top, bottom left and right margins.
- Use proper APA format as given to you in the attached example.
Affordable Care Plan
Following the implementation of the Affordable Care plan, the stakeholders in the care sector in the United States have had to change their approach to ensure consumers attain the right to care. Due to pre-existing conditions, high cost of medication and demand for consumer-based care, some of the stakeholders have confronted challenges addressing patient rights. However, the constraints ought not apply to trouble stakeholders capable of collaborating with the patient and other stakeholder in planning for care. As discussed, the formulation of proper guidelines on the approach to collaboration with other stakeholders in promoting consumer-based care is necessary to alleviate challenges of the goal of affordable care of protecting rights of consumers.
The first premise for supporting collaboration in duties is that the approach ensures that stakeholders adhere to the ethical standards of care in service delivery. As a result, the process of ensuring consumers regardless of the health status or preexisting conditions becomes tenable (Protection, & Act, 2010). The recognition of the right of the patient to influence care is equally possible if the service providers coordinate in formulating patient-centered program. Huntington, Covington, Center, Covington, & Manchikanti (2011) notes that the decision helps in preventing overlap of roles that complicate the duties of insurers.
The subsequent premise for supporting collaboration is that coordination facilitates exchange of information that leads to seamless operations when addressing the needs of specific patients. The practice is in line with the stipulation of affordable care act (Obama, 2008). The approach also empowers the consumers to guide professionals on suitable strategies for care and such fulfills the right to quality care.
Additionally, the decision to involve stakeholder alleviate costs incurred in planning on undertakings that can proceed in unison. The care institution sources date from other organizations when dealing with a person of a preexisting conditions. According to Huntington, et al. (2011), the modality minimizes cost since collaboration ensures that each party is cognizant of their roles in care administration.
In conclusion, the formulation of proper guidelines on the approach to collaboration with other stakeholders in promoting consumer-based care is necessary to alleviate challenges of the goal of affordable care of protecting rights of consumers. As discussed, collaboration ensures the progression of duties in accordance with the legislative terms while recognizing patient autonomy. Coordination also facilitates exchange of information leading to awareness in preexisting condition and reduction of costs, thus fulfilling the objective of providing quality care.
References
Huntington, W. V., Covington, L. A., Center, P. P., Covington, L. A., & Manchikanti, L. (2011). Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: reforming the health care reform for the new decade. Pain Physician, 14(1), E35-E67.
Obama, B. (2008). Affordable health care for all Americans: the Obama-Biden plan. Jama, 300(16), 1927-1928.
Protection, P., & Act, A. C. (2010). Patient protection and affordable care act. Public law, 111(48), 759-762.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Affordable Healthcare Plan Assignment