Americans with Disabilities Act Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Americans with Disabilities Act Discussion
I’m working on a social science writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Review the American with Disabilities Act (Links to an external site.) and recent changes in programs such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) (Links to an external site.)with regard to persons who have dual diagnoses.
You may choose another program that you are familiar with that is impacted by the ADA and assess regarding persons who have dual diagnoses.
After assessing this Act and program, discuss how a human service provider could advocate and assist someone with a dual diagnosis.
Youth Community Informatics and Libraries Discussion
I’m working on a social science question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
- Identify a program offered by a public library that relates completely, or in part, to the concept/practice of Youth Community Informatics?
- Briefly describe the program selected and indicate the way/s in which it fits the model of YCI.
- Suggest one other way that libraries can enact or participate in YCI programs. Why are these efforts important?
Americans with Disabilities Act Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow