Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
For this evaluation, consider the following:
Select a topic of interest and use the PICO(T) procedure to define and research the question.
The population, intervention, comparison, and result must all be defined beforehand. A time range is relevant in some circumstances, and you should mention it when crafting a question you can research connected to your topic of interest. Select the two sources of evidence that appear to be the most relevant to your topic and evaluate them in greater depth after you’ve defined your question, researched it, and organized your early results. Interpret each source’s unique results and best practices in relation to your concerns, as well as how the information would assist you in planning and making decisions about your question.
The PICOT Question and Research Template document may be useful if you need some framework to arrange your initial thoughts and research.
Make sure you address the following grading criteria in your submission:
Define a practice issue that will be investigated using the PICO(T) method.
Determine which sources of evidence would be useful in addressing a PICO(T) inquiry.
Explain what you learned through publications or other sources of information.
Explain how the findings from the sources of evidence you choose are relevant to making a decision about a PICO(T) inquiry.
Use the current APA style to communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with proper language and spelling.
Cite a minimum of four scholarly or professional sources to back up your findings and conclusions. Resources should not be older than five years.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
An Evidence-Based Approach |
An Evidence-Based Approach