Analysis And Reflection Of An Ethical Dilemma
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Analysis And Reflection Of An Ethical Dilemma
Each student will analyze and reflect on one ethical dilemma you have experienced in the field: current or previous practice, personal or professional relationships, or work. If you have not experienced an ethical dilemma, then you are to write about a potential ethical dilemma or one that a friend/co-worker has experienced. After summarizing the dilemma you are to reflect on how you handled the dilemma or what you witnessed.
Each student will then use one of the ethical/decision-making theoretical perspectives to examine the handling of the ethical dilemma- describe through that theoretical lens the experience.
Additionally, the student should address how he/she MIGHT have done it differently if they had an opportunity to “RE-DO”. Be sure to examine the ethical dilemma from a number of perspectives to provide a wholistic view of the dilemma and solutions.
This paper should be 3-5 pages long and should be completed in APA Formatting.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analysis And Reflection Of An Ethical Dilemma