Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Analysis of Journal Critique Project
JOURNAL ARTICLE: “Change Yourself, Step Up” by Herminia Ibarra. You must use the Central Texas College Oveta Culp Hobby Memorial Library.
Instructions:
Lesson One is due at the end of the week. The Report contains three graded activities:
The report includes the following components in this order (use a bold section header for each critical report element):
TRANSMITTAL LETTER: To the decision-maker (for this purpose, that is the Professor) —watch the video found in Lesson Tools for more information.
TITLE PAGE: Assignment title, plagiarism statement, and course information.
SECTION I: A short executive summary (ES) of the entire report —not to exceed (NTE) a half-page followed by a page break and NTE three paragraphs/single-spaced.
Executive Summary (ES) should answer this…if the decision-maker only reads your ES would the decision-maker want to move on through your report, or could they make a decision based on your ES?
SECTION II: The unique business journal critique essay (the article provided as part of the assignment) —watch the video found in Lesson Tools for more information.
SECTION III: The Internship Site update.
SECTION IV: Reference page, with references listed in APA format.
Length:
Sources:
The completed report cites three outside sources. Two sources should be from reviewed business journals.
Resource Material critique deck v.2
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|