Analysis Paper on Should We Have Universal Health Care solution

Analysis Paper on Should We Have Universal Health Care

Instructions:

Then, in three (or more) paragraphs, respond to the following questions:

Which justice theory appears to be guiding or shaping potential opposition to universal healthcare?

Which justice theory appears to be guiding or shaping support for universal healthcare?

Should the United States create a universal health-care system? Why do you think that is?

Case:

A health-care debate has raged in America since the turn of the twentieth century. The debate centers on whether the federal government has an obligation to ensure that its citizens have access to health care, thereby preventing them from

experiencing the financial hardships that come with rising medical costs. In his book, Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care Reform, historian and sociologist Paul Starr writes that efforts to “provide all Americans access to medical care and protect them from economic ruin” have long been a “liberal inspiration.” Reform from the Progressive Era gave Americans antitrust laws, labor legislation, the Federal Reserve, and workers’ compensation

in the early decades of the twentieth century, but reforming health care proved more difficult. Reform has been slow in coming. Following the New Deal, Social Security was established to provide a financial safety net for seniors in their later

years. The GI Bill and the minimum wage came along with Social Security. For decades, liberals have pushed for a universal health-care system that would protect all Americans from illness and high medical bills. Progressives thought they had broken through with the creation of Medicare and Medicaid, but that was not the case. “If Americans learned one thing from the history of health-care battles, it was that a government program to make health-care a right of citizenship had

always been defeated,” Starr wrote. Europe was the source of the first ideas for government-run health insurance programs. National health care in the United Kingdom and sickness funds in Germany were unpopular in America and never

gained traction. Workers’ compensation is similar to German sickness funds, but the idea of national health care, as in the United Kingdom, was politely rejected in the United States, much to the chagrin of progressives. Progressives within the

Republican Party formed the Progressive Party in 1912, with a platform that included support for social health insurance. Canada has a single-payer system that is strikingly similar to Medicare in the United States. Progressives hoped that the Medicare system would serve as a model for a larger program to establish a system for all Americans that would provide insurance similar to that provided by Medicare. In reality, none of the proposals in the United States resemble true government health care in the same way that the United Kingdom’s universal health care system does. Democrats largely played on Republican turf, as evidenced by the facts. Democrats sought compromise on the bill by combining reform

with deficit reduction, championing the original Republican idea of the individual mandate, and abandoning support for a government-run “public option.” They wanted to reach an agreement on one of the most contentious issues in American history. Although agreement was sought, discord was discovered. Perhaps agreement is impossible because the debate requires Americans to draw on deep-seated ethical principles. Perhaps the issue is more serious. Perhaps Americans are truly divided on the role of government in people’s lives.

Analysis Paper on Should We Have Universal Health Care

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analysis Paper on Should We Have Universal Health Care

Analysis Paper on Should We Have Universal Health Care

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!