Anthropologists Moral Obligation to point out dangerous cultures
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Anthropologists Moral Obligation to point out dangerous cultures
MY CLASSMATE WRITING
In my view, I agree that anthropologists should have a moral obligation to point out dangerous or questionable moral practices in a culture. Every culture has its own beliefs, history, mitos, or
something led them to their specific behavior, actions, or acts. I believe anthropologists should pass judgments but before they pass they have to go through lots of process or Procedures to end up with their result or judgment. These process begin with analyzing the culture they are going to judge. Reading more about their beliefs. Understand their history and circumstances they
passed through and the reason that led them to what they are now. Meeting their people and discuss with them their cultures and understand some details hidden about them. After this
process, the result or the judgment that Anthropologists will pass is going to be more reasonable and has fairness on it. Judging any cultures should be taken seriously because these
judgments could give bad or good impressions about the specific culture. In addition, we should not give any anthropologists the right to judge any culture but to examine his research and
analysis about the culture they judged. The outside perspective judge is not always right and the anthropologist who act in this way could lose his credibility because they decided to judge a culture based in his point of view and his or her culture or beliefs.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Anthropologists Moral Obligation to point out dangerous cultures