Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Anti-War Kent State Protest Discussion Assignment
KENT STATE PROTEST
A – Was the student protest morally justified? Why or why not? (support your position with a brief, well-reasoned argument)
2 – FLAG BURNING PROTEST (TEXAS V. JOHNSON 1989)
A – Was Johnson’s protest morally justified? Why or why not?
B – Do you agree with the SCOTUS decision about the legality of this? Why or why not?
3 – VIETNAM & IRAQ WARS
A – Using Just War Theory, in your opinion did the U.S. meet the jus ad bellum and jus in bello criteria for the Vietnam War? Explain.
B – Using Just War Theory, in your opinion did the U.S. meet the jus ad bellum and jus in bello criteria for the Iraq War? Explain.
4 – MILITARY CONSCRIPTION
A – If we are drafted to fight in a war, we have a legal obligation to report for duty. Do we always have a moral obligation to do so? When are we morally justified in refusing to report for duty (assuming we are physically/mentally fit to fight)? If you think we are never justified in refusing to fight, what makes us morally obligated to do so? Explain.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Anti-War Kent State Protest Discussion Assignment |
Anti-War Kent State Protest Discussion Assignment