Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment

Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment

CJ598

Week 2 Assignment

After completing the Reading for this unit, develop a 15-20 slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the application of theoretical foundations to current knowledge and practice in emergency management. Select three of the theories listed below and consider how each informs our efforts in homeland security and/or emergency management.

Complexity Theory

Risk Perception Theory

Systems Theory

Vulnerability Theory

Apply the three selected theories to existing policies and procedures in emergency management and/or homeland security and analyze recommendations for improvement. Include the following:

An overview of each of the selected theories and their relevance to the practice of homeland security and/or emergency management.

An application of each of the selected theories to real-world examples of efforts related to homeland security and/or emergency management (such as phases of the EM cycle, counterterrorism efforts, etc.) and the established policies and procedures utilized in those efforts.

An analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of the selected efforts within the context of the theories applied and established policies and procedures.

Recommendations for the continued application of theoretical foundations to emergency management knowledge, doctrine, and practice.

Be sure to write in a scholarly and objective tone, avoiding the use of first person, personal pronouns, contractions, and colloquial or conversational language. Use citations from scholarly, peer-reviewed sources throughout to support your content and credit sources of information and ideas. 

Note: This assignment requires outside research. Use at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the Reading material throughout your assignment to support your content and credit sources of information and ideas.

Develop your presentation using bullet points of main ideas on the slides themselves, and use the speaker notes to fully develop the analysis and evaluation component. The speaker notes must be presented in complete sentences. All content — whether on the slides or in the speaker notes — must be properly cited per APA. The use of images or graphics is permitted, but they must be properly cited. Avoid using copyrighted material, such as organizational logos, etc. Select a basic slide design for use throughout the presentation. Maintain a scholarly and objective tone, avoiding the use of first person, personal pronouns, contractions, and colloquial or casual language. Use citations from scholarly, peer-reviewed

sources (a minimum of four in addition to the Reading) throughout to support your content and credit sources of information and ideas.

This is the response given to the problem statement from Week 1 from the professor:

You have a good start here. However, you need to be careful about your use of sources and citations. The Phoenix task force was created in 2013. As such, the source you cite as having commented on the challenges faced by the Phoenix task force cannot have written about it in 2012, when it did not yet exist. In addition, that source makes no mention of this task force specifically. It is important that you are not misattributing content to sources in your citations. Note also that the research must focus on addressing the problem – such as overcoming challenges – rather than simply identifying what those challenges are. As you continue to revise this, be sure you are clearly articulating a focused approach to research that can address the problem. 

Please double-check all cited sources to make sure the dates line up with the facts of The Phoenix Task Force. Thank you.

Directions

Your 15-20 slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides.

Use one basic slide design and layout.

Text large enough to be read by your audience (font size 20-34 point).

Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content.

You may use pictures, charts and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide

Use bullets for your main points.

Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).

Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained.

Presentation should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful.

Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics

Appropriate citation style should be followed

You should also make sure to:

Use examples to support your discussion

Cite all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and reference and cite within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. For more information on APA guidelines, visit Academic Tools.

Directions for Submitting Your Assignment

Compose your assignment and save it in the following format: Course#_LastnameFirstname Unit # Assignment (example: HM598_SmithJohn Unit 1 Assignment). Submit your assignment to the appropriate Dropbox by the end of the unit.

Example of Good Per Reviews you can use:

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment

Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!