Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Write a 1500-2500 word analysis where you will do the following:
Identify what you have learned in the class that has broadened your understanding of rhetoric. (Could be a text (preferably the textbook) to world application).
Identify TWO rhetorical criticism/methods that you can actively apply to TWO communication scenarios. Be specific about the methods and the scenarios by providing specific examples and evidence of application.
In your analysis cite specific content that was assigned from the course. These citations should conform to APA7 format. (Once you determine which two rhetorical criticisms you would most like to write about I can upload documents shared in class on those methods and you can apply that information to the paper as is required).
(Links to an external siAPA formatting.
PAPER FORMATTING AND CITATIONS
Length: 1500-2500 words (approximately 5-10 pages, double-spaced).
Format: Include the prompt at the top of the page and the word count at the end. One-inch margins and a font size that does not exceed 12 points is recommended. The paper should be double spaced and have standard formatting for paragraphs, quotes, and citations.
Citations: Paper must cite specific content that was assigned from the course. It is suggested that you use 3 citations from the text/powerpoints available to you in your “files” tab on canvas.
Style: Paper should conform to a standard style guide like APA 7
(Links to an external sitA (Links to an external site.)
College-level Writing: The essay should be mechanically correct with proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |