Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
FORMAT
Exams should be typed in 12 point font and double-spaced. Answers should be numbered and uploaded to Turnitin as a single document. DIRECTIONS: This exam covers Weeks 5 and 6 of the course.
There are two (2) components to the exam. There are four (4) short answer questions in Part 1. Short answer questions should be answered in 2-4 sentences. Two (2) comparison essays make up Part 2. The length of a comparison essay should be no more than 1-2 paragraphs. The artist (if known), title, and date of the work should all be included.
If you copy straight from the textbook, the internet, PowerPoints, or any other source, you will be compelled to retake the exam. Quotes should not be used. Essays should be free of typos, misspellings, and other problems. PART 1: QUIZZES WITH SHORT ANSWERS (40 points) Please respond to all four (4) questions. Answers should be 2-4 sentences long.
1. What features of Michelangelo’s David (1501-1504) are typical of Italian Renaissance art? a total of ten points
Question 2: Which Impressionist painting from Week 6 PowerPoint 2 do you believe best exemplifies Impressionism’s characteristics? Why? a total of ten points
Question 3: Explain the connection between Enlightenment ideas and Classical art in Jacques-Louis David’s Oath of the Horatii (1785). a total of ten points
Question 4: How does the picture Snowstorm: Hannibal and His Army Crossing the Alps (1812) by Turner convey the sublime? a total of ten points ESSAYS OF COMPARISON IN THE SECOND PART (60 points) COMPLETE BOTH ESSAYS OF COMPARISON. Essays should be 1-2 paragraphs long.
1. Compare and contrast Caravaggio’s Entombment (1600-1604) with Rembrandt’s The Company of Captain Frans Banning Cocq (The Night Watch) in an essay (1642). Consider how the two works of art are similar and different. Remember to think about the works’ subject matter, style, medium, and formal features, as well as its intended meaning/purpose and historical context.
The fundamental theme of the comparison should also be addressed in your essay. a total of 30 points Caravaggio, Entombment Rembrandt, Captain Frans Banning Cocq’s Company (The Night Watch) 2. Comparative Essay Compare and contrast Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa (1503-06) with Picasso’s Girl with a Mandolin in an essay (1910).
Consider how the two works of art are similar and different. Remember to think about the subject, style, medium, and formal features, as well as the historical context.
The fundamental theme of the comparison should also be addressed in your essay. a total of 30 points Girl with a Mandolin by Leonardo da Vinci, Mona Lisa by Pablo Picasso 2nd page of 2
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Art 3100 Final exam on art characteristics |
Art 3100 Final exam on art characteristics