Assessment Through the Lens of Palliative Care Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Assessment Through the Lens of Palliative Care Paper
To integrate knowledge of palliative care concepts and generalist social work practice, please examine hot topics in contemporary palliative care research and practice and write a brief two- to three-page discussion paper. You are to choose one of the following four topics that have received considerable lay press and professional/academic attention:
- The movement to change “palliative care” to “compassionate care” due to a perceived barrier to access;
- Medical Assistance in Dying/Physician Aid in Dying
- The use of alternative therapies (e.g., psychedelics, virtual reality, music medicine, etc.) in end-of-life care. Please note, you just have to select ONE alternative therapy to write about in your paper.
- Palliative sedation
After choosing your hot topic, please discuss (sub-headings are allowed and encouraged):
- The hot topic through the lens of palliative care (e.g., What is the hot topic? How does this hot topic impact palliative care overall?)
- Why the topic is a “hot” topic (e.g., conflicting issues, ethical tensions, ideologies, etc.)
- What this hot topic means for social practice, and what the role of the social worker is as it pertains to the issue
Assessment Through the Lens of Palliative Care Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow